Feb. 15, 2007
Human Trials Of SOD1 Blocker Expected Soon
Neuroscientist and
neurologist Timothy Miller of the
University of California-San Diego
says recent MDA funding has allowed
his group to move closer to human
trials of an experimental compound
that blocks abnormal SOD1 genetic
instructions, a genetic cause of
amyotrophic
lateral sclerosis (ALS).
ALS is caused by a
mutated SOD1 gene only about 1 percent
to 3 percent of the time. Nevertheless,
it’s perhaps the best-understood
form of the disease and almost the
only form used in animal-based ALS
studies.
Miller says a recent
meeting with the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) assured him that he’s
on the right track with preclinical
testing of the compound’s
possible toxicities in animals,
a prerequisite for a human trial.
The anti-SOD1 compound
makes use of recent developments
in the field of gene blocking with
so-called “antisense,”
pieces of genetic information that
keep other genetic information from
being processed.
Miller and colleagues
Don Cleveland at UCSD, Richard Smith
at the Center for Neurologic Study
in La Jolla, Calif., Merit Cudkowicz
at Harvard University and Isis Pharmaceuticals
in Carlsbad, Calif., are using antisense
to block the abnormal RNA instructions
that would otherwise result in ALS-causing
superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) protein
molecules. (When cells process a
genetic recipe for a protein, they
first convert DNA to RNA.)
When Miller and colleagues
infused SOD1 antisense molecules
into the brains of rats destined
to develop ALS because they have
mutated SOD1 genes, they saw an
8 percent increase in overall survival
in these rodents compared to their
untreated counterparts. But when
the researchers looked specifically
at survival after disease onset,
they saw a 30 percent difference
between the treated and untreated
rodents.
“We’re
very encouraged about the extension
of survival after onset,”
Miller says. “For patients
who are symptomatic [show symptoms],
I do think this therapy will provide
benefit.”
In fact, he believes
the benefits in human patients might
be even better than in the rodents,
because the animals produce about
15 times the normal amount of SOD1,
while humans, though they make abnormal
SOD1, don’t overproduce it.
One potential problem
is that the antisense compound can’t
distinguish between normal and abnormal
SOD1 RNA and therefore blocks both.
(People with SOD1-related ALS nearly
always have one normal SOD1 gene
and one mutated one.) Miller, however,
isn’t overly concerned.
“With antisense
therapy, you’re not going
to reduce the level to zero,”
Miller notes. “You’re
likely to get about a 50 percent
knockdown, which may be a very appropriate
level to decrease the toxicity of
SOD1 but still maintain enough of
the function of the enzyme.”
The human trial will
involve infusing SOD1 antisense
compounds through an electronic
pump into the fluid surrounding
the spinal cord. Pending the outcome
of the toxicity studies and approval
from the FDA, Miller hopes to begin
late this year.